All posts by admin

PSI IT Consultant

Author Alan Maddick 22nd April 2021

The ATO has recently released a new draft tax ruling covering PSI (Personal Services Income) TR 2021/D2 this will go in force soon possibly with some minor changes. One of the scenarios we come across quite often in IT consultants wanting to know if the PSI rules apply to them.

If capured to by the PSI regime then Consultants will be limited in what they can claim and not be able to effectively use Business Structures like Trusts and Companies as part of their tax planning. So what does the new ruling say ? One of the key tests that IT consultants can pass is the Results test, the new new ruling has a couple of example scenarios;

A government department enters into a contract with Consultant Co for the provision of services by an individual who is nominated in the contract. The terms and conditions of the contract are that the individual is paid an hourly rate and works for a maximum of eight hours per day. Departmental officers provide direction as to the required tasks and the manner in which they are to be performed. The individual is provided with an office, stationery and desktop computer, and uses the department’s computer system, software and data for carrying out the required tasks. He also uses his personal laptop to assist him in his tasks but is not required by the department to use it. If the work performed by the individual is unsatisfactory, the department is entitled to terminate the contract, but the company is not required under the contract to rectify any defects in the work performed. Consultant Co is a PSE because its income includes the PSI of the individual who does the work.

TR2021/D2 at para 177

In this scenario the ruling states this is PSI and the results test is not met.

A government department enters into a contract with Consultant Co for the provision of services by an individual who is nominated in the contract. The terms and conditions of the contract are that the individual is required to develop a product for use on the department’s IT system in accordance with functional specifications provided by the department. The contract specifies a fixed amount by way of payment to Consultant Co for the development of the product which is required to be produced within 12 months of the commencement of the contract. Instalments of the contract price are payable upon achievement of specified milestones. From time to time, the individual uses departmental equipment to access the department’s IT system. However, the development work is undertaken primarily on the individual’s own equipment located at her business premises. If the final product does not satisfy the functional specifications, the contract requires the work to be rectified. Consultant Co is a PSE because its income includes the PSI of the individual who does the work.

TR 2021/D2 at para 180

In this example the results test is quite clearly met. The issue is what if your situaion is somewhere in the middle? For example you are paid per hour but you are liable for the contract if the implementation does not work? At Maddick Consulting Group we are experts at PSI and can help you work out if the PSI rules do apply to you. Please get in touch today.

Allocation of professional firm profits

Author Alan Maddick 2nd March 2021

The allocation of profits in Professional Services Firm has been an evolving area in Income Tax Law for a number of years (since at least the 1980s) its an area that I have worked actively in since starting my Practice. In the last few years the tax Office has actively engaged Professional Services Firms and their Advisers to try and develop clear guidance on what is allowable and what is not.

On one end of the spectrum we have some Professionals that treat their Business Income and PSI declaring 100% of their income on their personal return.

On the other end of the spectrum we have Professionals who are streaming all or a large majority of their Income to Family Trusts and other structures reducing their Taxable Income down to artificially low levels.

The treatment of these issues also varies from Industry to Industry with some (for example Accountants) paying little attention to the older case law and others like Medical Practitioners often relying heavily on the 1980s laws and guidance.

The ATO has recently released draft guidance PCG 2021/D2 to me this looks well written and does clarify the ATOs position. So what does it say;

The main message remains in line with other guidance publish over the last few years – there should be a commercial reason for any structuring that is put in place and overall the average tax rates paid should not be too low.

There is quite a bit more detail in the draft guidance from the Tax Office which is great and gives everyone a lot more certainty.

Illegal Phoenix

When you run a Company, sometimes things can go wrong. Maybe you have made a mistake in your management of the company? This is ok, we are human and business can be complex. Or Perhaps something has happened out of your control like Covid -19 or one of your Customers not paying you.

In this case you can liquidate your Company and avoid paying many of the debts of your business, this is one of the great things about operating a business as a Company but in some cases Business Operators will take advantage of this to deliberately avoid paying debts. In this case as a Director you could be pursued by the Government.

From ASIC’s perspective, the key characteristics of illegal phoenix activity involve circumstances where:

A company fails and is unable to pay its debts;
Directors of that company act in a manner which intentionally denies unsecured creditors (usually small businesses and employees) equal access to that company’s assets in order to meet unpaid debts; and
Within some period of time soon after the failure of the initial company (usually within 12 months), a new company commences using some or all of the assets of the former business, and is controlled by parties related to either the management or directors of the previous entity.

https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/articles/illegal-phoenix-activity/

If you are worried about the Financial position of your Company or trying to work out how to re-start your business after a failed business has gone under please come in and see us. At Maddick Consulting Group we will only advise you on Business Structuring that is Legal and Ethical.

BitCoin

Bitcoin – wow. Back a while ago, perhaps 7 or 8 years ago a freind of mine explained what Bitcoin was and how he and his freinds were mining them using old PCs that they had cobbled together. Honestly my attitude was “what the hell are you talking about” I guess back then BitCoins were worth around $50 or $100 each, today they are around $40,000 each.

What is the future of Bitcoin and Crypto? Well right now they are going a bit nuts but really who knows what the future holds, certainly they have now moved from some fringe concept to a fairly mainstream Investment.

From a Tax point of view the Australian Tax Office does view BitCoin and Crypto Currency like any other asset so yes if you were as lucky as my friend you now have a rather large tax issue. You can read more about the ATOs view of Crypto here if you would like to discuss your tax position please get in touch.

An emerging area we are seeing here at the practice is more and more people wanting to use their Super Fund to buy Bitcoin (or other Crypto Currencies). This is possible and relatively straight forwards, to get access to Crypto with your super you will need to set up a Self Managed Super fund and then purchase currency from there. We have plenty of experience in this now and there are a few special issues you need to be aware of so we do highly recommend you talk to a professional before starting down this path.

If you would like to know more about how we can help you invest in BitCoins or Crypto Currency please get in touch.